|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Nooma K'Larr
Minmatar Cat's Cradle
|
Posted - 2010.05.18 12:57:00 -
[1]
They're not bugs, they are typos and it only serves to pad the bug-fix list.
C'mon CCP, you can do better than that. ___________________________________________________ CSM - Bring back Medium Shader! |
Nooma K'Larr
Minmatar Cat's Cradle
|
Posted - 2010.05.19 08:36:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Makar Kravchenko
Originally by: Dan O'Connor
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails what i want to know is when they will spell armour correctly lol
x
Technically, "armor" and "armour" is correct.
Just like "Defence" and "Defense"
*shrug*
why is this a thread.
Thanks for hijacking the topic people.
The thread is/was about why CCP finds it necessary to include spelling corrections as a bug fix when all it is is fixing a typo. My insinuation being that they use it to "pad" their bug fix list so it looks like they have done more "bug fixes." ___________________________________________________ CSM - Bring back Medium Shader! |
Nooma K'Larr
Minmatar Cat's Cradle
|
Posted - 2010.05.19 11:57:00 -
[3]
Originally by: CCP Greyscale
3) Locate a programmer with room in their schedule (ie time not already committed to something else) 4) Locate a QA tester with room in their schedule (ditto)
That alone answer a lot. Seems you don't have dedicated personnel for "small" changes. That is why small changes hardly ever take place. But take it from me, small changes is what "quality of life" is all about. It's the little things that make people happy.
Perhaps your company should reconsider their priorities on these matters.
------------------------------------------------ Please support my anti-macro mining proposal. |
Nooma K'Larr
Minmatar Cat's Cradle
|
Posted - 2010.05.19 12:35:00 -
[4]
Originally by: CCP Greyscale
Originally by: Nooma K'Larr
Originally by: CCP Greyscale
3) Locate a programmer with room in their schedule (ie time not already committed to something else) 4) Locate a QA tester with room in their schedule (ditto)
That alone answer a lot. Seems you don't have dedicated personnel for "small" changes. That is why small changes hardly ever take place. But take it from me, small changes is what "quality of life" is all about. It's the little things that make people happy.
Perhaps your company should reconsider their priorities on these matters.
Even when you get said personnel in place, you still need to schedule in each individual change - EVE has more than enough potential small changes to fill multiple years of work, so you still need to prioritize on a case-by-case basis.
Just want to say, it's great hearing from a dev...Thank You for taking the time to share some inside info with us.
OT: A viable solution, and probably a only one time solution, is to have an "expansion" dedicated to game play instead of new features. Focused on big killing, macro busting, bounty hunting fixing...etc.
EVE is a great product, but I'm sure I'm not alone in saying this: I feel it could be so much more. And by "more", I mean polishing up what you already have before moving on to new material.
------------------------------------------------ Please support my anti-macro mining proposal. |
|
|
|